Workplace Relations Tribunal in Australia

Questions: 1.How accomplishes the Fair Work Commission settle on understandings? 2.How accomplishes the Fair Work Commission favor understandings? 3.What are the means that are associated with the settling on and affirming of understandings? 4.What are the qualities and the shortcomings of this procedure? Answers: Presentation Republic Court of Conciliation was built up as Australias first work environment relations board under the Commonwealth Conciliation and Arbitration Act 1904. The organization created because of social, financial authoritative changes therefore, Fair Work Australia was framed which later came to be known as Fair Work Commission. Reasonable Work Commission is the present national working environment relations council in Australia. The commission is an autonomous body which works on different expert fields areas the capacities are done by the individuals from the commission. A portion of the capacities are connected with the conditions wages of business, a post on the activity bartering of the ventures endeavors, giving answers for mechanical debates both interior outer, status of the representatives in the modern market different issues of the work environment too. The entire activity is regulated by the President with the assistance from his managerial staffs. 1. Reasonable Work Commission gives data about the procedure of understandings made by the ventures. Undertaking understandings, for example, the terms states of the business are made between a business a worker. The commission additionally gives data about the questions that happen during understandings just as the endorsement dissatisfaction with understandings (Westacott, 2017). The understanding of an undertaking can be framed between more than one managers and multiple workers alongside their regarded agents. Then again, when no representatives are utilized, the business himself haggles with other worker associations. The endorsement of the understandings of the venture may fluctuate contingent upon the kinds of understanding. There are three sorts of understandings: Single venture understandings include a solitary business or more bosses (fundamentally, franchisees) co-working together is basically a solitary undertaking. Multi endeavor understandings include at least two bosses who are unquestionably not single intrigue managers. Greenfields understandings include at least one businesses of another undertaking or who will build up an endeavor however have not yet utilized any workers for the direct of the venture. Understandings like this can either be a solitary undertaking understanding or a multi endeavor understanding. The understandings of undertakings contain different issues, for example, the states of business, installment of the workers, consultative strategy, giving answers for mechanical debates additionally about the conclusion of the wages of a representative for any reason. In any case, they can never incorporate any sort of illicit terms or conditions. After the understandings are made, the way toward dealing comes into light. Through this procedure the businesses the representatives can arrange the terms and states of the understandings (Macneil et al., 2014). 2. After the finish of the haggling procedure of the understandings, certain pre-endorsement steps should be taken to guarantee that the understandings can be affirmed by the Fair Work Commission. The business should assume the liability to obviously clarify pretty much all the terms and states of the consent to the workers the impact that it will give. In the wake of tolerating the terms conditions, all the workers need to decide in favor of the consent to show their endorsement. An effective democratic may happen just when the understandings are appropriately made. For a solitary undertaking, most of the representatives of the business need to make their choice to embrace the understanding. For multi-undertaking, most of workers of at any rate one managers need to cast substantial votes to underwrite the understanding. Presently, on the off chance that the representatives of the considerable number of businesses dont favor the understanding, at that point it will just cover those b usinesses their workers who have endorsed it. On account of Greenfields understanding, every business every one of their workers need to sign their endorsement for the understanding (McPhail, Jerrard and Southcombe, 2014). All the understandings of the representatives contains both legal unlawful substance. The legitimate substance are: The issues related with the business connection between the businesses the representatives who will be secured by the conditions of the understanding. The issues related with the connection between a business the association of the workers which will likewise be secured by the understanding. On the off chance that under any circumstance, the wages of the representatives are deducted then it likewise ought to be secured by the understanding. The strategy or the procedure of the activity of the understanding. Then again, all the understandings ought not contain any sort of unlawful substance, for example, Any shocking or biased term against the workers or the association, a term which will empower a representative or a business to quit from the procedure of the understanding, a term which is connected with unlawful uncalled for choice to excuse any worker who has finished a base measure of the business time frame, a term which acts in an unfavorable path to any representative as an individual a term which isn't reliable appropriately to the activity of the mechanical arrangements (Angwin, 2017). 3. After the democratic meeting, the understandings should be applied to the Fair Work Commission for the endorsement. Particular agents from each endeavor need to apply to the Commission for the understanding utilizing the Form F16. All the application for the understandings must be submitted to the Commission inside those 14 days time frame when the understandings were made the agents should likewise submit alongside the application a real consented to duplicate of the arrangement too. The applications can be send to the Commission office through email, express post or even face to face. The applications can likewise be held up through the Online Lodgment Service (Forsyth, Gahan, Howe, 2011). 4. The commission must be happy with a few substance of the understanding before furnishing with any sort of endorsement, for example, the Commission will ensure that the pre-endorsement steps of the understandings have been dictated by the ventures and that the understandings have been genuinely concurred by the representatives and that they have not been constrained upon. The Commission additionally need to regulate that whether the understanding has finishes the happier by and large assessment that it doesn't contain any terms through which the NES can be prohibited. The understanding ought not contain any illicit terms it must give a few systems to the settlement of any debates inside or remotely. The understanding ought to likewise incorporate an interview an adaptability statement also (Townsend, Wilkinson, Burgess, 2013) As a rule the commission may give an endorsement on the understandings of the ventures including of a few endeavors. For example, the Commission may endorse an understanding that might not have met the numerous necessities of the Fair Work Act 2009. This may happen just when the Commission is happy with a composed endeavor by certain venture. The composed endeavor may be affirmed on the off chance that it doesn't cause any money related or installment emergency to the workers just as it won't prone to carry any noteworthy changes to the understanding. In the wake of endorsing all the understandings of the ventures, the Commission will formally report their choice alongside the affirmed understanding just as with any composed endeavors which have been acknowledged. All the understandings, endorsements choices will be distributed on their official site a duplicate of each affirmed understandings will be sent to each gathering or endeavors included. End The Fair Work Commission is extraordinary compared to other working environment relations court for the individuals of Australia. The foundation of this commission has given answers for each emergency which are connected with each expert parts or ventures alongside their bosses representatives. The Commission does an inclusion of the considerable number of questions that occur inside the endeavors, for example, understandings made between the businesses of the ventures and their regarded workers. No understanding made between a business a representative is legitimate until except if it has been affirmed by the Fair Work Commission itself. Along these lines, each endeavor needs to send their haggling delegate to hold up an application with the Commission to get an endorsement for their understandings. It is crucial for the Commission to follow certain means before favoring the any understanding. Subsequently, the undertaking should meet all the detail focuses before shaping an underst anding between the businesses the representatives. Here and there, understandings probably won't address all the issues of the Commission yet those understandings may in any case be acknowledged affirmed if the Commission is fulfilled by composed endeavor by the undertaking. The way toward haggling is plainly placing the Australian mechanical structure in a negative angle. It is likewise hampering the financial, social authoritative structure of the nation also. Consequently, the commission needs to restore back the basics of the bartering of the venture which they expected to accomplish or prevail. This will support the businesses, representatives the associations to cooperate to confront the business challenges together or there will be consequences, Australian Industries won't have the option to take an interest in the worldwide rivalry. The Commission should attempt to modernize the haggling arrangement of the undertaking by stifling them to concentrate just on those deals which are pertinent to the ventures, businesses the representatives. Thusly, there is additionally an extension for monetary thriving in the nation. References Angwin, M 2017, EBAs are presently only a blockage to efficiency, Australian Financial Review, 14 February, p. 39. Forsyth, A, Gahan, P Howe, J 2011, Weighty measures: haggling in balanc

Analysis of Ethanol in Moonshine Free Essays

Examination of Ethanol in Moonshine| Using the GC-MS| Jennifer Greene| â€â€â€â€â€â€â€â€â€â€â€â€â€â€â€â€- 4 May 2012 â€â€â€â€â€â€â€â€â€â€â€â€â€â€â€â€- 4 May 2012 Introduction: In this test gas chromatography is applied to isolate the water-ethanol blend. This technique is frequently utilized in the assurance of liquor in blood or pee. One clear application is when law authorization organizations need to decide if somebody is intoxicated. We will compose a custom paper test on Examination of Ethanol in Moonshine or on the other hand any comparative subject just for you Request Now In these cases, high affectability is required since 0. 1% blood liquor content is viewed as lawfully inebriated in many states. Our own assurance will manage higher focuses (up to 25% by volume) which are progressively regular of liquor levels found in numerous mixed drinks. Chromatography is a physical technique for partition where the segments to be isolated are disseminated between two stages, one of the stages establishing a fixed bed of huge surface territory, the other being a liquid that permeates through or along the fixed bed Gas chromatography (GC) is an amazing and broadly utilized instrument for the detachment, recognizable proof and quantitation of segments in a blend. In this procedure, an example is changed over to the fume state and a streaming stream of bearer gas (frequently helium or nitrogen) clears the example into a thermally-controlled segment. On account of gas-fluid chromatography, the section is normally pressed with strong particles that are covered with a non-unpredictable fluid, alluded to as the fixed stage. As the example blend travels through the segment, test segments that cooperate unequivocally with the fixed stage invest more energy in the fixed stage versus the moving gas stage and consequently require more opportunity to travel through the segment. The objective of GC is to isolate and distinguish parts of a blend as proficiently as could be expected under the circumstances and it is in this manner alluring to have a proportion of the effectiveness of a given chromatographic section. One basic approach to communicate section effectiveness is by computing the tallness proportional to a hypothetical plate (HETP) which is the length of the segment separated by the quantity of hypothetical plates. HETP = l/n The quantity of hypothetical plates (n) of a section as for a specific compound can be discovered utilizing the accompanying condition: N = 16(tr/w)2 = 5. 55(tr/w1/2)2 Where w is the pinnacle width estimated in indistinguishable units from tr and w1/2 is the pinnacle width estimated at half of the pinnacle tallness. Materials: GC-MS with database| Vials with lids| Cherry moonshine| Disposable pipettes| Ethanol 100%| | Procedure: 1. Set up strategy to: Set â€Å"Detector A† On (Thermal Conductivity Detector) Packed Column Head Pressure: 30 psi Column: Carbowax 20M, 1/8†³ OD, length = 6 feet Oven Temperature: 110 °C Detector Temperature: 150 °C Injection Temperature: 150 °C 2. With the expendable pipette fill separate vials with the cherry moonshine and unadulterated ethanol. . Run the system at that point characterize the ethanol top with three extra pinnacles. This is the chromatograph for Cherry Moonshine. This is the chromatograph for Cherry Moonshine. Information: The blue bolts are highlighting the ethanol top. The blue bolts are highlighting the ethanol top. Determination: Chromatography is a physical technique for partition wherein the segments to be isolated are dispersed between two stages, one of the stages establishing a fixed bed of enormous surface region, the other being a liquid that permeates through or along the fixed bed. Gas chromatography (GC) is a ground-breaking and broadly utilized device for the partition, distinguishing proof and quantitation of segments in a blend. In this strategy, an example is changed over to the fume state and a streaming stream of bearer gas (frequently helium or nitrogen) clears the example into a thermally-controlled segment. On account of gas-fluid chromatography, the segment is generally pressed with strong particles that are covered with a non-unpredictable fluid, alluded to as the fixed stage. As the example blend travels through the section, test segments that collaborate unequivocally with the fixed stage invest more energy in the fixed stage versus the moving gas stage and in this way require more opportunity to travel through the segment. This trial exhibited how the investigation of an obscure substance can be resolved from the different pinnacles. In the event that you select an individual top on the chromatograph, the database will raise potential matches of the compound. You would need to take a gander at the mass spectrograph of that top to check whether it coordinates the compound of intrigue. On the off chance that it does, at that point you have affirmed one intensify that is available in the substance. On the off chance that it's anything but a match, keep on looking through the database until you affirm the peak’s character. From this analysis, the top for ethanol was not decided utilizing the mass spectrograph of the gas chromatography; be that as it may, we ran unadulterated ethanol on the GC-MS and contrasted the two chromatographs with decide the ethanol top. The most effective method to refer to Analysis of Ethanol in Moonshine, Papers

Monsieur Meursault In Camuss book The Stranger - Free Essay Example

  Albert Camuss book The Stranger contains a very complex character, Monsieur Meursault. Meursault has complete indifference to the world around him. His attitude towards the lack of meaning in everything is easily relatable for many, until the effects of his indifference catches up to him and manifests itself. The common philosophy that many place Meursault in is nihilism. Meursaults distinct philosophical characteristics provide a view of nihilism and his inevitable acceptance of death gave him meaning to life, which is the fact that he lived. Meursaults complete indifference to his surroundings and his prioritization of his needs before emotion, places him closer to nihilism. In the beginning of The Stranger he shows absolutely no emotion towards the death of his mother as he doesnt display any emotion during the funeral except for annoyance towards [t]he glare on the white walls was making me drowsy(9) and the constant mentions of the women who was crying softly, steadily, in little sobs(10). His display of indifference follows him throughout the novel. After he comes back from the funeral, he begins people watching from his window, and comes to the realization that one more Sunday was over, that Maman was buried now, that I was going back to work, and that, really, nothing had changed(14). Although he experienced the death of his mother everything else is as if nothing happened and therefore Meursault conclude that the death of his mother does not matter. His physical needs are placed in priority compared to anything. Some would say that his relationship with Marie would be completely physical and non-emotional for him. The evidence for this is quite clear after he says to Marie that marriage to her didnt make any difference to [him] and that we could if she wanted to(41). She then asks him if he loves her in which answered the same way [he] had the last time(41). His complete indifference is very similar to those that follow the existential nihilist ways. Friederich Nietzsche is the philosopher that created nihilism in western cul ture. He believed that one should act as if they would if they had to reenact that day for eternity. So in laymans terms you should live your life they way you want to, and not allow for self-denial to overcome your freedom. Since Meursault completely allows his needs to overtake him some would say that he isnt a nihilist, but he does as he wants to and recognizes the choice that he has in his actions. He also completely reject morals, as does Nietzsche, as he finds nothing wrong with the murder of the Arab, or the letter that Raymond asked him to write to his girlfriend. In this way he is even more distant from society. My philosophy is a slight variation of existential nihilism, but I find that such things that have logical purpose, and that purpose is not found by the individual but by the collective whole. Meursault finds meaning when he begins to recognize the past. The analysis of Meursaults psyche forces him to confront his past actions. The main action that they focussed on was his lack of emotion during his mothers funeral. Meursault believes that the mention of this was co mpletely irrelevant to the case, but it does affect what he thinks about while imprisoned throughout the trial. He begins to remember physical things and the emotions that he is given with those things, such as the ice cream bells. These memories inevitably lead him to the epiphany that the meaning to his life is that he lived. When the trial is over and he is put on death row, Meursault recognizes that he will inevitably die, but he also recognizes that he should come to his own moral conclusion as it is apart of the process. He concludes that he doesnt have morals and that his life hadnt any meaning, but his death is meaningful due to the amount of people who had come to watch him die. He then embraces the hatred of the people, because it gives his death meaning. This is very similar to Nietzsches belief in which meaning can only be decided by the person, and any other meaning to life is considered meaningless to tat person. Meursault displays this when he attacks the chaplain. The chaplain attempts to push his religious beliefs on Meursault which is also an attempt to have Meursault find meaning. Although the chaplain is unsuccessful in helping Meursault find meaning and closure to his life, he is at the same time successful as well. The chaplains ignorance to Meursaults philosophy angers Meursault, but it forces him to come to the conclusion that although his life was meaningless, his death has meaning. My philosophy is somewhat different. I believe that there isnt any meaning to life or death of one person. In order to make ones life meaningful they must find a way to impact the society and not themselves. This can be achieved through creation, whether it be physical or not. In the end the morals of a person do not matter, but the ideas that the person had on life, and problems within society, are the things that matter in ones life. Although I do believe that the purpose of The Stranger from Albert Camuss view is not to define Meursault to a specific philosophy, society has made it its purpose. Therefore this is a book that not only forces its audience to confront a diffic ult and complex philosophy, and can even impact their own philosophy. For myself, this book did indeed modify my philosophy, but it wasnt any significant change. The reason for this books literary significance then becomes clear when one recognizes the impact it plays on a society. This complex character demonstrates the literary skill that Camus has, but it shows the world that you can have a character so complex that the world will focus on that character and compare it to themselves. In that way it has purpose but, like Meursault, that purpose is found towards the end of its journey.

Tree Planting and Reforestation

Pocahontas - Cultural Anthropology Essay - 1009 Words

Writing Assignment #1: The Cultural Construction of the Idea of Progress Film chosen: Pocahontas One of Walt Disney’s most famous films, Pocahontas, takes place in the 1600s, as the British discover parts of the â€Å"New World† that are inhabited by native Americans. In this film, we are able to contrast the primitive lifestyle and culture of the Native Americans to that of the British, and are able to see how the ideas of â€Å"progress† or social evolution play a role in the ethnocentric bias held by the Westerners during this time, causing the primitive stereotypes to be built. Disney uses the structure of the characters themselves- what they wear, how they speak, what they eat, what they believe in, etc.; and the plot line of the film, to†¦show more content†¦The initial reaction to seeing the culture and way of life amongst the Indians is to see them as â€Å"uncivilized† and â€Å"savage†, just as John Smith was saying on the boat. However throughout the film Disney begins to challenge this belief and sh ows us that the westerner’s way of life may not be the best way of life for everyone. Up until this point, John Smith and the rest of the English men had been discovering new places and finding Native American’s that had been living for many years on these foreign lands. The Europeans always saw these natives as uncivilized, barbaric savages, who needed to be taken over and â€Å"westernized†. John Smith makes a comment to Pocahontas about how they could make the Indians life better, and build them roads and tall buildings, and teach them how to â€Å"make the most of their land†. This is a perfect example of the ethnocentric bias mentality of the Europeans. They never once considered that someone else’s way of living and culture could actually be a successful. They thought that their way was the best way, and anything else was just an underdeveloped, barbaric lifestyle that needed to progress into the westernized lifestyle. After John Smith makes this comment about â€Å"bettering the Indian’s life styles† Pocahontas is deeply offended and proceeds to sing the popular song, The Colors of the Wind. In this song Pocahontas calls John Smith out on his ethnocentric stance and showsShow MoreRelatedEssay on Racism in Disney Films2220 Words   |  9 Pagesthe process; have perpetuated an institutionally racist society based on harsh stereotypes. Minorities are often underrepresented, and even completely left out, of many Disney films such as Dumbo (1941), The Lion King (1994), Aladdin (1992), and Pocahontas (1995). As students enter the doors of schools, they bring with them the notion that white characters and people are superior to blacks or other minorities because that is how they are depicted in Disney films. However, is the â€Å"magical world of

Analysis of Four Seasons Business Culture

Question: Discuss about the Analysis of Four Seasons Business Culture. Answer: Introduction: The European culture differs from the culture in North America and France. The ability to consistently offer exceptional services by Four Seasons increased the hotels revenues at an average of 22.6 percent annually since 1996 through 2000(Roger, David, Carin-Isabel, 2003). Exceptional services meant offering personalized, high-quality services that maximized Four Seasons Hotels and Resorts value over the time. Four Seasons had a unique management and team structure whereby compensation was based on service quality, employees attitudes, and property profit. The management of Four Seasons-operated with the principle that, " they should deliver high-quality services with most valuable standards to the customers and at a minimal cost to the Hotel itself. However, the firm felt comfortable of going global to international markets where different business cultures created a new experience. For one to become a manager in the global setting, world citizenship was essential (Moran, Abramson, Moran, 2014). The management required that discipline, compassion, and modesty was significant in knowing customers interest and maintaining professionalism in the international market. High prevailing firm sentiment established a strong association to the business. The success of Four Seasons resulted from longevity employee retention who had a strong allegiance to the Hotel(Roger, David, Carin-Isabel, 2003). The field and corporate staff valued the firm as they did to their families with strict obedience to rules, procedures, traditions, and work ethics. Four seasons approach to global growth committed more efforts to creating diversity and enhancing singularity. The processes needed to launch and open hotel was the same to the local procedures(Roger, David, Carin-Isabel, 2003). The operating standards of Four Seasons have been universal in that the management advocates for providing delicious meals, comfortable rooms, and providing a timely message to the clients. The key value of Four Seasons services is the choice to offer exceptional, personal services that distinguish the Hotel from other Restaurants. Customized services are just an element of success, but not the primary determinant. Hiring employees who are unique in character and skills just like the guests, this resulted to delivering anticipatory, enthusiastic, and intelligent services. Service culture was core as the firm put all beliefs into practice. Intellectual empathy while treating guests was highly emphasized, famously termed "The Golden Rule." This rule was highly acknowledged in all cities, towns, and villages all over the globe. The human resources of Four Seasons treated guests with close attention just the same way they would have wished to get dealt with by others. However, working in the international arena needed cultural adjustment by a manager to cope with that nation's business culture. This is because management of different cultural perceptions could be problematic for Four Seasons (Gunlu, Aksarayli, ?ahin Perin, 2010). For instance, North Americans operating in France. Valuing human relationships and interrelationships were key. Communication and conflict resolution was promoted in the hotel through horizontal communication approach. Employees, managers, and supervisors respected superiors and this cultivated sensitivity and success. Four Seasons aimed at providing friendly customer services with sensitivity and dedication to enhancing quality guests services. Understanding different country cultures on business especially in France made the firm excel and sustained competitiveness in the industry (Clerides, Nearchou, Pashardes, 2008). The Seven Four Season's customers service cultures comprised of a smile, eye contact, recognition, voice, informed, cleanliness, and caring for every guest. References Clerides, S., Nearchou, P., Pashardes, P. (2008). Intermediaries as quality assessors: Tour operators in the travel industry.International Journal of Industrial Organization,26(1), 372-392. Moran, R. T., Abramson, N. R., Moran, S. V. (2014).Managing cultural differences. Routledge. Gunlu, E., Aksarayli, M., ?ahin Perin, N. (2010). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment of hotel managers in Turkey.International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management,22(5), 693-717. Roger, H., David, B., Carin-Isabel, K. (2003). Four Seasons Goes to Paris: 53 Properties, 24 Countries, I Philosophy". Paris: Harvard Business School.

The Republic Book I Essay Example For Students

The Republic Book I Essay Most normal individuals in the modern world would assume that all books written, not published, by man are based on either a portion of the authors imagination, an event (biased or non-biased) in either history or during the life of the author, a straight-out autobiography, or a generalized biography of another person they once knew. However, this philosophical novel fits none of the descriptions above. The book is actually an in-depth recording of a philosophy contest between Platos teacher Socrates and several other great philosophers. What is significant about this contest is that, in it, Socrates describes his personal view of a perfect world, and why justice is so important in the process of creating a civilized world. We will write a custom essay on The Republic Book I specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now The novel was completed in 370 B.C., and it describes a strong debate between Socrates and five other speakers. The two main arguments that he illustrates in this novel are that a ruler cannot obtain more power than the state, and that a philosopher is best suited to rule a nation since he has the ability to maintain this balance. Also, Socrates claims that only the philosopher has traveled beyond the cave of worldly desires and temptations to discover what justice really is. Socrates first major argument is with Thrasymachus in Book I. The current debate lies on the pure definition of justice. Thrasymachus claims that there is only one principle of justice: the interest of the more dominant force. Socrates counters this argument by using the phrase the stronger. He claims that the ruler of a nation will not be aided, but harmed, by an unintentional command, in the long run. Socrates then builds his argument gradually by stating that the good and just man looks out for the interest o f the weaker, and not for himself. Thrasymachus tries to counter Socratess argument by vaguely proclaiming that injustice is more gainful than justice. However, Socrates bravely explains that the just man will live happily because he has a just soul, and the man with the unjust soul lives in poverty; therefore, injustice can never be greater than justice. At this point in the novel I saw Thrasymachuss flaw and also the reason why Socrates has silenced Thrasymachus. Injustice, in my opinion, may be better as a short-term plan for pleasure, but in the long run the unjust man will be condemned by just men of his evil deeds, thus leading to his downfall. This is a point Thrasymachus failed to see, and thus his argument was too unilateral. This is the reason I believe he lost, and his failure led me to believe that Thrasymachus is a knowledgeable man without wisdom(whereas Socrates had both). After Thrasymachuss defeat, Glaucon steps up to challenge Socrates. Glaucons first argument is that doing injustice and not being punished for it is much more pleasurable than suffering injustice at the hands of unjust rulers and practicing justice. Glaucons brother, Adeimantus, backs up his brothers speech by stating that an unjust man with a deceivably just reputation(which is almost always the trait of the perfectly unjust man) is also better than the just man. But Socrates counters these two strong speeches by proclaiming that, in an average city, justice is needed for the Senate to build the city, for citizens to trade and barter with foreigners, and for training and educating soldiers for battle. Socrates also states that justice comes from God and those who follow his example become just. Although these two arguments are striking contrasted content-wise, there is a connection between them. If a man is unjust, he will not only be condemned by men, but by God as well. And even t hough there may be no Supreme Being that controls the Earth and its neighboring planets, injustice will still cause harm, leading to more injustice and finally the destruction of the world. I am quite positive that Glaucon and Adeimantus are thinking in the same manner as Thrasymachus; they are thinking short-termed and are explaining their arguments in terms of the present. Of course, three unjust men in a world where just people rule could get away with almost any unjust act. But injustice leads to more injustice, as well as justice leads to more justice. Therefore, if the following is considered true, then unjust men leads to more unjust men, and then what would happen if unjust men ruled the world. There would be many intense conflicts, which would lead to violence and hatred, and finally, the destruction of mankind. So therefore in the end, unjust men would lose. .u2a5eb72d6d90b9dec85be83c86c9288b , .u2a5eb72d6d90b9dec85be83c86c9288b .postImageUrl , .u2a5eb72d6d90b9dec85be83c86c9288b .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .u2a5eb72d6d90b9dec85be83c86c9288b , .u2a5eb72d6d90b9dec85be83c86c9288b:hover , .u2a5eb72d6d90b9dec85be83c86c9288b:visited , .u2a5eb72d6d90b9dec85be83c86c9288b:active { border:0!important; } .u2a5eb72d6d90b9dec85be83c86c9288b .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .u2a5eb72d6d90b9dec85be83c86c9288b { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .u2a5eb72d6d90b9dec85be83c86c9288b:active , .u2a5eb72d6d90b9dec85be83c86c9288b:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .u2a5eb72d6d90b9dec85be83c86c9288b .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .u2a5eb72d6d90b9dec85be83c86c9288b .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .u2a5eb72d6d90b9dec85be83c86c9288b .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .u2a5eb72d6d90b9dec85be83c86c9288b .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .u2a5eb72d6d90b9dec85be83c86c9288b:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .u2a5eb72d6d90b9dec85be83c86c9288b .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .u2a5eb72d6d90b9dec85be83c86c9288b .u2a5eb72d6d90b9dec85be83c86c9288b-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .u2a5eb72d6d90b9dec85be83c86c9288b:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Individual Development Plan EssaySocrates continues with his argument by saying that persons of worth should be given the greatest respect and authority, which includes the Greek gods as well. Socrates also claims, using the arts of medicine, music, and gymnastics; that one who practices these arts constantly and repeatedly with disregard to his surroundings will soon become one with the art, and forget about what is really important in a mans life. This act will most definitely lead to injustice. Socrates polishes off the remainder of his argument by stating that the way of life of a man should be a guardian of the State; for they have courage and are never too lazy to pr otect the city from an enemy. The men who have plenty of possessions, however, become greedy and turn against their fellow citizens. During Socratess argument, in my opinion, Adeimantus looks to be stupefied by Socratess great wisdom and knowledge, and how Socrates takes simple points and develops them to defend his argument. However, Adeimantus(unlike the cowardly Thrasymachus) continued to participate in the debate, although saying little much than phrases agreeing with Socratess arguments. In Book IV, Adeimantus proposes a question to Socrates, asking what Socrates would do if someone blamed him for the economic condition of the man. Socrates responds, first of all, that if a man lives by education, courage, and self-mastery, he should have no trouble making a decent living in the modern world. Justice finds its place in these three principles because they are the common traits of the State, which all mankinds should respect and follow. Socrates continues his argument by generally stating throughout a long river of metaphors, symbols, and great understanding, that just men appreciate other just men, but not men opposite of what he is. Unjust men, on the other hand, appreciate neither just men nor other unjust men. The only interest they care about is that of himself. At this point Thrasymachus, Adeimantus, and Glaucon believe that Socrates has gone overboard with his arguments. Socrates replies by saying that it takes great depth inside wisdom and understanding and man y comparisons relating to everyday life to understand what truth really is; the three speakers then resume their positions. Socrates goes on by saying that men who make the best rulers possess not only political understanding and military leadership, but also great wisdom and understanding; therefore these people are the ones who have a complete understanding of what justice is. These rulers could also be philosophers with military experience, or military leaders with a great sense of philosophy. It seemed to me in this point in the novel that Glaucon and the other two were tired of Socratess arguments because they were too long and besides the point. However, as Socrates had said earlier, justice is not merely explained in minutes. It is a subject that must be looked into very closely and with the greatest respect and gravity. Socrates then explains that not all who claim to be philosophers are actually philosophers. At this point in the novel, Socrates explains the difference between those that claim to be philosophers, and those that actually are philosophers. Men who only claim to be philosophers are only thinking of building a reputation. At first they seem to be wiser and more knowledgeable than others, but after they have gained the respect of the citizens, they become corrupt and rule the city unjustly. Real philosophers, however, find that it is in their best interest to govern wisely and make laws fair enough for the good of the people, not for the benefit of the ruler. Real philosophers also have wisdom and understanding, which gives them a better understanding of justice than corrupted rulers. In any case, I am beginning to agree with Glaucon and the others about how Socrates builds his arguments; now its a good thing for a philosopher to start with a simple idea, and then use it to form the bas is of the philosophers opinion. However, in my opinion, Socrates is overdoing the formations of his opinions. For example, in Book VI, Socrates goes on and on about good and evil philosophers; much of what he says is pretty much beside the point, in my opinion. .u27fb9d7cb786518e491b0029bfaf19bc , .u27fb9d7cb786518e491b0029bfaf19bc .postImageUrl , .u27fb9d7cb786518e491b0029bfaf19bc .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .u27fb9d7cb786518e491b0029bfaf19bc , .u27fb9d7cb786518e491b0029bfaf19bc:hover , .u27fb9d7cb786518e491b0029bfaf19bc:visited , .u27fb9d7cb786518e491b0029bfaf19bc:active { border:0!important; } .u27fb9d7cb786518e491b0029bfaf19bc .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .u27fb9d7cb786518e491b0029bfaf19bc { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .u27fb9d7cb786518e491b0029bfaf19bc:active , .u27fb9d7cb786518e491b0029bfaf19bc:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .u27fb9d7cb786518e491b0029bfaf19bc .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .u27fb9d7cb786518e491b0029bfaf19bc .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .u27fb9d7cb786518e491b0029bfaf19bc .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .u27fb9d7cb786518e491b0029bfaf19bc .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .u27fb9d7cb786518e491b0029bfaf19bc:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .u27fb9d7cb786518e491b0029bfaf19bc .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .u27fb9d7cb786518e491b0029bfaf19bc .u27fb9d7cb786518e491b0029bfaf19bc-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .u27fb9d7cb786518e491b0029bfaf19bc:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Effects Of Media Essay ThesisSocrates, after the previous argument, goes on to say that there is a difference between what the eyes see and what the mind sees. According to Socrates, the eyes see both small and great, but in a confused manner.(Book VII, section 524) What this means is that the eyes alone cannot distinguish what is right from what is wrong since they contribute to many sins, such as lust, coveting, and several others. After this statement, Socrates claims that the mind was compelled to reverse the process, and look at small and great as separate and not confused. (Book VII, section 524). What this means is that the mind, with the aid of wisdom and knowledge , can sense right from wrong easily. After all of Socratess arguments about justice, Socrates concludes his entire debate by describing what he calls a perfect State. This perfect land was The type of government in this State is democracy(where people rule the land) because then the people can obtain plenty of freedom to achieve their own pleasures without being pushed around by a superior force. In democracy also is equality, since people rule the government, and there is no reason for a man to be treated as an inferior by a fellow citizen. What the State does not have is a tyrant, which Socrates goes into great detail about in Book IX. The tyrant, as Socrates describes, is unable to satisfy anyone but himself. Therefore he has few, if any, friends. The tyrant is also a ruthless ruler; he is hard-hearted and will not forgive anyone of doing wrong to him. Finally, Socrates points out that, in his perfect State, philosophers will always have the advantage over other types of rulers b ecause they have wisdom and knowledge, which gives them the ability to govern justly and wisely. In my opinion, Socratess perfect State sounded plenty like the scenario progressing in the debate. Socrates, since he is a great philosopher, had the advantage over everyone because he was wise and intelligent in his arguments; therefore he obviously knew more about justice than anyone else. So, in conclusion, Socrates won the debate on the definition of justice. The reason for this is because Socrates, as stated before, had the wisdom and knowledge to analyze, in the most descriptive way, what justice really is. Glaucon and the others lacked what Socrates had, and so they could not support their arguments as well as Socrates could. I really liked this novel a lot because I am a lover of philosophy and understanding. However, I must admit that some of Socratess arguments were redundant and besides the point. But other than this crucial flaw, the book showed great insight, and Socrates cr eated a vivid description about what justice means to the modern world. Bibliography: